shreekhand
08-26 11:27 AM
Actually, it has been mentioned several times since past few years that the RD that you see online is infact the ND. This is NOT the date the the CLAIMS3 system sorts by. Whether it takes 2 days for someone to enter the data or 2 months the RD date is fixed - it is the date they receive your application. While entering data they look at this received date stamp and enter that as RD.
Many National Customer Service (call center employees) only go by what they and you see online and hence give your ND as RD. The ND by far carries no value for sorting and priority purposes.
Majority of IIO's at service centers will mention RD as the date of relevance as they look directly into the CLAIMS system and are better informed than call center employees or Infopass IIO's !
I really hope that clears the confusion....
sdrblr,
Are you sure you were talking to a TSC IIO, because SR's are only opened by the call center employees.
On my 485 receipt, I have RD as 7/20/07, ND as 9/13/07. But when I check my case online, it has 9/12/07.
I had called TSC yesterday and the rep kept telling 9/12/07 and TSC is processing 8/30/07. I told her I have the original receipt in front of me and it says 7/20/07 and not sure where you are getting 9/12 from. She said "Oh I am sorry, I was looking at the incorrect place". She later gave me a SR # and took all the info. The funny part was she even refused to open a SR telling the date was 9/12.
Not sure whether opening a SR now will help but trying does not hurt and it is FREE !!!! Hopefully the officer looks at my file and then approves it.
Many National Customer Service (call center employees) only go by what they and you see online and hence give your ND as RD. The ND by far carries no value for sorting and priority purposes.
Majority of IIO's at service centers will mention RD as the date of relevance as they look directly into the CLAIMS system and are better informed than call center employees or Infopass IIO's !
I really hope that clears the confusion....
sdrblr,
Are you sure you were talking to a TSC IIO, because SR's are only opened by the call center employees.
On my 485 receipt, I have RD as 7/20/07, ND as 9/13/07. But when I check my case online, it has 9/12/07.
I had called TSC yesterday and the rep kept telling 9/12/07 and TSC is processing 8/30/07. I told her I have the original receipt in front of me and it says 7/20/07 and not sure where you are getting 9/12 from. She said "Oh I am sorry, I was looking at the incorrect place". She later gave me a SR # and took all the info. The funny part was she even refused to open a SR telling the date was 9/12.
Not sure whether opening a SR now will help but trying does not hurt and it is FREE !!!! Hopefully the officer looks at my file and then approves it.
wallpaper Vauxhall Astravan SPORTIVE SE
pdx_Soft_Eng
12-19 12:04 AM
I just sent my 3rd contribution = $50.
jsunkavalli
04-03 06:25 PM
Last year the H1B US MS cap wasn't over until the mid week of April and I think this year it's not going to be the same as there were a lot of missed MS applicants(I am one of them) but I don't think that the MS quota cap has no reached yet.
2011 Vauxhall Astra Van Sportive
santb1975
11-20 02:27 AM
I assumed you had the intention of contributing an amount less than 100$. For some reason I remember you asking if you could contribute 50$ Last Friday. I could have had a DejaVu. Sorry about my MisInterpretation
How to contribute ONE TIME to IV through PAYPAL for amount less than $100?
How to contribute ONE TIME to IV through PAYPAL for amount less than $100?
more...
fatjoe
08-23 11:01 AM
Thanks fatjoe,
R u the primary applicant...so your wife got the interview...were u able to accompany her...so all the questions dealt with her....that's strange...I thought dependent applicant r not asked questions abt employment et al...
SoP
Yes, I'm the primary app. Both of us went for the inetrview..., we can do that... the questions were regarding both of us, like both of our employment letters, paystubs, W2s, since both of us are working, and also EAD, H1/H4 797s, etc of both us.
I have heard from the forums and also the attorney, that it is not unusual to call only the "derivative of the applicant"(spouse) for interview. But husband/wife may choose to accompany the spouse for the interview. Since I was there, I answered some of them too.
R u the primary applicant...so your wife got the interview...were u able to accompany her...so all the questions dealt with her....that's strange...I thought dependent applicant r not asked questions abt employment et al...
SoP
Yes, I'm the primary app. Both of us went for the inetrview..., we can do that... the questions were regarding both of us, like both of our employment letters, paystubs, W2s, since both of us are working, and also EAD, H1/H4 797s, etc of both us.
I have heard from the forums and also the attorney, that it is not unusual to call only the "derivative of the applicant"(spouse) for interview. But husband/wife may choose to accompany the spouse for the interview. Since I was there, I answered some of them too.
USCISSucks
07-17 10:02 PM
Thank you so much for providing Big and successful voice to the affected community! you guys Rock!
more...
amaruns
03-06 02:02 PM
Voted yes.
2010 Vauxhall Astra van 2006 on-
gccovet
03-09 12:20 PM
Just sent $25 via Paypal as pledged.
GCCovet
GCCovet
more...
alisa
02-04 10:48 PM
Man,
I'll just shut up after this post now. You are obviously incapable of understanding my argument.
I'll continue to assume that IV is working for the interests of all EB based applicants, and not just those belonging to one particular country, especially at the expense of EB3-ROW. And I am pretty confident that the core and the majority of the members of this forum have enough integrity to let people like me know I am mistaken in this belief.
I do not care whether you contribute to IV or not. What I am writing here is law or facts and how it is affecting oversubscribed countries becuse of wrong interpretation of law. I am not here to unite or divide any group. In my level, I am contributing to end retrogression by sending mails to law makers. Even any law passes to remove retro, this misinterpretation of law is screwing Indians and Chinese. A EB2 person from Iran/Iraq/Pakistan with PD 2007 can get GC with in 6 months (right from PERM labor to 485 approval) why should Indian with PD in 2003 has to wait for ever?
My employer hired me not based on citizenship. They hired me based on their requirement for the job and my skills. They do not care, if I am male or female or Indian or Chinese or Iranian or Iraqi or Pakistani or European. I am penalized for just I am Indian not able to adjust LPR even I have priority date in 2003 after a long wait for Labor certification and 140 approvals. However, if I am from other than India and China I would have got GC with in six months even if my PD in late 2006. If a person with a Priority Date 2007 can become LPR immediately in EB2 category even if he is from a state sponsoring terrorism (provided if his background check is cleared). However a person from India having priority date in 2003 can not become LPR and sitting in dark to hope to see the light at the end of tunnel. How fare it is? Is it not the discrimination by country of birth?
I'll just shut up after this post now. You are obviously incapable of understanding my argument.
I'll continue to assume that IV is working for the interests of all EB based applicants, and not just those belonging to one particular country, especially at the expense of EB3-ROW. And I am pretty confident that the core and the majority of the members of this forum have enough integrity to let people like me know I am mistaken in this belief.
I do not care whether you contribute to IV or not. What I am writing here is law or facts and how it is affecting oversubscribed countries becuse of wrong interpretation of law. I am not here to unite or divide any group. In my level, I am contributing to end retrogression by sending mails to law makers. Even any law passes to remove retro, this misinterpretation of law is screwing Indians and Chinese. A EB2 person from Iran/Iraq/Pakistan with PD 2007 can get GC with in 6 months (right from PERM labor to 485 approval) why should Indian with PD in 2003 has to wait for ever?
My employer hired me not based on citizenship. They hired me based on their requirement for the job and my skills. They do not care, if I am male or female or Indian or Chinese or Iranian or Iraqi or Pakistani or European. I am penalized for just I am Indian not able to adjust LPR even I have priority date in 2003 after a long wait for Labor certification and 140 approvals. However, if I am from other than India and China I would have got GC with in six months even if my PD in late 2006. If a person with a Priority Date 2007 can become LPR immediately in EB2 category even if he is from a state sponsoring terrorism (provided if his background check is cleared). However a person from India having priority date in 2003 can not become LPR and sitting in dark to hope to see the light at the end of tunnel. How fare it is? Is it not the discrimination by country of birth?
hair Used Vauxhall Astra van
texanguy
08-21 06:15 PM
If you really think about it bro, we would have been better off not knowing this instead of knowing it...
what difference would it have made, if he just kept this to himself rather than disclosing it? how is getting this information out a great service to the people whose priority dates are current? its like saying, that guys...dont start dancing yet...its going to rain on your parade!
take it easy bro...
why would anyone think about causing so much stress to hundreds of people? what would they get from that.
He has taken time and effort to share this info, atleast lets acknowledge that.
Whether its true or not is a different story.
what difference would it have made, if he just kept this to himself rather than disclosing it? how is getting this information out a great service to the people whose priority dates are current? its like saying, that guys...dont start dancing yet...its going to rain on your parade!
take it easy bro...
why would anyone think about causing so much stress to hundreds of people? what would they get from that.
He has taken time and effort to share this info, atleast lets acknowledge that.
Whether its true or not is a different story.
more...
little_willy
08-21 04:07 PM
So, what should we now complain about and who should we write the letters to? that's all I need to know.
hot Used Vauxhall Astra van
pappu
03-09 11:47 AM
People who contribute can also see others that have contributed on this thread by clicking the arrow on 'donation Goal' above. These members will have access to information and updates in a special contributors area we are creating on the forum.
more...
house Used Vauxhall Astra van
kumaruhtx
04-10 06:54 PM
Thanks for the Info.
Where did u get the information from?
Can you provide with the Official Link?
Thanks
Where did u get the information from?
Can you provide with the Official Link?
Thanks
tattoo Vauxhall Astravan Astravan 1.7
GCNirvana007
08-20 02:09 PM
Yes it does..
ID PD/ RD/ Approved Date
kalikart -- 11/26/03 : 5/1/08 : 8/19/09
well he is approved
ID PD/ RD/ Approved Date
kalikart -- 11/26/03 : 5/1/08 : 8/19/09
well he is approved
more...
pictures Vauxhall Astra Van Mk3. astra
anurakt
12-20 08:40 AM
Looks like this campaign is loosing the steam..... My $500 have been waiting for two days now..... We started with 33% capital and not even at 50% ...this forum cannnot even run for 17%..... forget the next 50% we need to cover by 31st December.... Looks like I saved some money.
dresses VAUXHALL Astra Van Club 1.7
joanneh0102
04-27 06:37 PM
Check this news out:
http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?newsid=1092805
Do you think is there any possibility that US government may raise the cap this year?
http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?newsid=1092805
Do you think is there any possibility that US government may raise the cap this year?
more...
makeup Vauxhall Astravan ASTRAVAN 1.7
Caliber
03-09 12:24 PM
Just now paid 50.00 using paypal. With this, my total contribution: 1250.00
Donation to Support Immigration Voice (User: Caliber)
$50.00 USD for one month
Effective Date: Mar. 9, 2009 $50.00 USD
Donation to Support Immigration Voice (User: Caliber)
$50.00 USD for one month
Effective Date: Mar. 9, 2009 $50.00 USD
girlfriend Used Vauxhall Astra van VAN
ilikekilo
02-26 10:06 PM
take it easy, I totally understand what u r saying, but calm down..thanks
hairstyles Used Red Vauxhall Astra LS
vdlrao
03-07 08:32 PM
I am in and Voted yes.
hopesoon
12-07 11:08 AM
It is sad that we are even having this discussion and people would justify child birth under this circumstance
akr_roy
07-21 11:30 AM
Hey EndlessWait, thanks for your input and assurance. Thats what my lawyer said but he also mentioned it depends on the adjudicating officer and to keep my fingers crossed.
I dont understand the element of discretion attributed to teh adjugating officer. Isnt the 180 days a LAW? Is it possible that an application is denied if its less than 180 days and the person has reentered multiple times?
I dont understand the element of discretion attributed to teh adjugating officer. Isnt the 180 days a LAW? Is it possible that an application is denied if its less than 180 days and the person has reentered multiple times?