vladdrac
06-01 04:25 PM
lol, ok a thousand
wallpaper According to People, Beyonce
chanduv23
02-07 04:38 PM
They won't be any better off here.Instead of being kicked out fair and square, they will be made to decay on H1 visas for 15-20 years. Talk of choosing a rock over a hard place. Besides, the British MPs seem to at least understand what skilled immigration means - here they will have the pleasure of being grouped with meat-packers and grape-pickers who matter-of-factly walked across the border.
I think its also a lesson for those tired of the US immigration system and considering moving to other countries - lets face it, immigrants are not exactly welcome anywhere. Either stick it out, or return to home country.
yes I shared my views with few friends who are moving to US on h1b from UK and advised them that grass is not greener here either. For some reason, a lot of people still do not understand the retrogression issue, anyways, when they come here they will know :)
I think its also a lesson for those tired of the US immigration system and considering moving to other countries - lets face it, immigrants are not exactly welcome anywhere. Either stick it out, or return to home country.
yes I shared my views with few friends who are moving to US on h1b from UK and advised them that grass is not greener here either. For some reason, a lot of people still do not understand the retrogression issue, anyways, when they come here they will know :)
EkAurAaya
07-19 09:58 PM
First of all let me congratulate and thank IV for working tirelessly to bring about this huge benefit for most folks stuck in the green card mess. I have always believed in IV and its power to move mountains. However, in the midst of all this rejoicing, let's not forget a certain class of IV members who will not be able to take advantage of this recent benefit for all practical purposes. I am talking about the folks who are currently single and will not be able to file for their (future) spouse before Aug 17. It seems to me that the best thing that IV can do to bring relief to these folks is to lobby for and effect legislation to exclude dependents from the visa cap, i.e let dependents (or at least spouse) to file for I-485 even when priority dates are not current. I believe this single piece of legislation (if we can make that happen) will have a big effect on the entire community, because that will free up that many visa numbers that would otherwise have been used up, and let folks get their GCs faster (even if they are happy with their EADs and APs). Can IV focus on this front please ?
Congratulations btw to everyone who will be taking advantage of this window of opportunity.
LOL :D
Congratulations btw to everyone who will be taking advantage of this window of opportunity.
LOL :D
2011 Foxy! Billie Piper revealed a
vaishalikumar
09-18 10:11 PM
Today's work will definitely bring fruits tomorrow !
more...
LONGGCQUE
03-31 11:56 AM
for me its erroring out saying incorrect alert id. Any thoughts ?
chanduv23
02-08 02:25 PM
Isn't the UK issue different.
They are trying to change rules retroactively. There is no such thing going on here.
A similar stance would be if in midstream: lawmakers changed retroactively that only if the job makes more then $150,000 it is qualified for EB2; only companies with revenues of over $20 million can apply for greencards. If they changed the rules retroactively in USA which would preclude people who are already in line; then you would see massive amounts of protests.
However; what is happening in UK is not the same issue here. Same thing happened in Canada a few years ago when they changed the point system and wanted to do it for people retroactively.
Here, with retrogression in the background, a lot of mess is being cleaned up and a lot of enforcements are coming in place to curb visa abuse. It is quite interesting to see how enforcements are being done and how things will be handled because on one side job market is booming, on one side you find big and small consulting doing alll sorts of things and utilising visas, on one side you see locals (Especially older people who lost jobs and find it diffucult to find jobs because of their age). Overall, it wwould bee interesting to see what will the course of action be.
From what I understand, Retrogression is the only "retroactive measure using diplomacy" and I guess thats it. Stricter enforcements will be there but those who manage to get past, will always get past.
IVs strategists must look into a diplomatic angle to come up with mechanisms to fight retro which I think IV is currently doing and is on the track.
They are trying to change rules retroactively. There is no such thing going on here.
A similar stance would be if in midstream: lawmakers changed retroactively that only if the job makes more then $150,000 it is qualified for EB2; only companies with revenues of over $20 million can apply for greencards. If they changed the rules retroactively in USA which would preclude people who are already in line; then you would see massive amounts of protests.
However; what is happening in UK is not the same issue here. Same thing happened in Canada a few years ago when they changed the point system and wanted to do it for people retroactively.
Here, with retrogression in the background, a lot of mess is being cleaned up and a lot of enforcements are coming in place to curb visa abuse. It is quite interesting to see how enforcements are being done and how things will be handled because on one side job market is booming, on one side you find big and small consulting doing alll sorts of things and utilising visas, on one side you see locals (Especially older people who lost jobs and find it diffucult to find jobs because of their age). Overall, it wwould bee interesting to see what will the course of action be.
From what I understand, Retrogression is the only "retroactive measure using diplomacy" and I guess thats it. Stricter enforcements will be there but those who manage to get past, will always get past.
IVs strategists must look into a diplomatic angle to come up with mechanisms to fight retro which I think IV is currently doing and is on the track.
more...
paritp
08-22 02:39 AM
HI ,
I am A july 2 filer at TSC.My aplication reached at 10 a.m. My checks got cashed on 8/17 ..........no RN yet.
I am A july 2 filer at TSC.My aplication reached at 10 a.m. My checks got cashed on 8/17 ..........no RN yet.
2010 50 cent back tattoo.
namm80
11-19 10:55 PM
dpp: did you open a SR or contact USCIS that you think might have expedited your FP? Also, what was the timeline of your case Xfr from CSC back to NSC? Also, is your FP scheduled at an ASC in CA Bay area? Pleasr provide more information.
I have got FP appt notice 7 days back. I am July 2nd filer, filed at NSC, but transferred to CSC and then back to NSC. Also, got AP and EAD approved long time back from CSC.
I have got FP appt notice 7 days back. I am July 2nd filer, filed at NSC, but transferred to CSC and then back to NSC. Also, got AP and EAD approved long time back from CSC.
more...
dixie
01-25 12:43 PM
Why don't we just voluntarily mention the amount that we contributed in our signatures ? Since contributions are voluntary, so should be the option of disclosing information on it. When many contributing members start furnishing their contribtion information voluntarily, it becomes the "fashion" and others will follow suit, as no one wants to look like a free-rider.
As for the veracity of the information, we got to trust each other on that and follow an audit policy- I assume the core members/ administrators have the ability to cross-check the contribution information if someone looks suspicious. Anyone caught furnishing false information can be blacklisted. Such a policy minimises the work of the core team, without being overly intrusive.
As for the veracity of the information, we got to trust each other on that and follow an audit policy- I assume the core members/ administrators have the ability to cross-check the contribution information if someone looks suspicious. Anyone caught furnishing false information can be blacklisted. Such a policy minimises the work of the core team, without being overly intrusive.
hair pictures Beyonce Knowles#39;s
desi3933
03-18 10:56 AM
Best advice? Talk to more than 1 immigration lawyer.
I don't need to talk to Immigration Attorney.
Have a good day!
I don't need to talk to Immigration Attorney.
Have a good day!
more...
gc_on_demand
09-22 11:24 AM
I have lost hope since last time it failed to even talk HR 5882. Let Antis be happy.. This is my/our fate..
hot finger tattoos. 6 of 10
easygoer
08-20 04:21 PM
Break a coconut?? Is that slang for opening a bottle?????
Break the coconut is slang for sacrifcing animal to god. Traditionally, animal sacrifice was replaced by coconut.
Break the coconut is slang for sacrifcing animal to god. Traditionally, animal sacrifice was replaced by coconut.
more...
house Jay-Z and his wife Beyonce
raghavdutt
05-02 08:04 PM
With all due respect.. members (including senior members) have just made the entire e-filing discussion (EAD / AP) just bit complected..
Here is the link to USCIS website, which specifically talks about e-filing forms (Top right side of the page).
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=f3fe194d3e88d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=9059d9808bcbd010VgnVCM100000d1f1d6a1 RCRD
If the link doesn't work then go on uscis.gov >>> select Immigration Forms >>> select Electronic Filing (Left side of the page) >>> select Forms Currently Available for E-Filing.
Once there you can read all about e-filing and click on the desired form to move forward.
Good luck fellow members.
Here is the link to USCIS website, which specifically talks about e-filing forms (Top right side of the page).
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=f3fe194d3e88d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=9059d9808bcbd010VgnVCM100000d1f1d6a1 RCRD
If the link doesn't work then go on uscis.gov >>> select Immigration Forms >>> select Electronic Filing (Left side of the page) >>> select Forms Currently Available for E-Filing.
Once there you can read all about e-filing and click on the desired form to move forward.
Good luck fellow members.
tattoo Beyoncé#39;s Girl Power Rings
panky72
10-01 09:50 PM
You dont need any transit visa if you are going to India from USA after legal stay in US.
my wife has an online travels company and I have confirmed with her .
How about coming back fron India to US on AP and expired H-1??
my wife has an online travels company and I have confirmed with her .
How about coming back fron India to US on AP and expired H-1??
more...
pictures tattoo Shakira Rules Forum gt;
bestofall
09-20 07:23 PM
You stolen all our Hearts :)
Thanks
Thanks
dresses Rihanna Tattoo Neck
kevinkris
08-28 01:47 PM
Hi deafTunes123,
I went to infopass yes'day, mainly to confirm my priority date. My employer used RIR labor and ported to PERM. Not sure of the PD, so took infopass.
She printed the screenshot and given me.
Find the screenshot attached. Preference E21 is EB2.
E31 is EB3
http://tinyurl.com/6rjs5p
Thanks.
Guys,
I took an info pass last week to check the status of my case. Specifically to check whether the interfile is success or not. IO at USCIS office mentioned that she cannot check whether my case is in EB2 or EB3. I am surprised to hear that. Gurus any has this kind of experience?
Also, She mentioned that my case is assigned to an Officer on August 13th. Do any one has any info how many days(on average), an Office will take to approve a case. Any info. is helpful to me and all.
Overall the Field Office people were polite.
Thanks,
Thun.
EB3 INDIA:
PD: Jan 21, 2004
I-140 approved: July 2005
I-485 ND: 09/04/2007
RD: 07/03/2007
EB2: (Same Employer)
PERM: Jan 21, 2007
I-140 Approved: 07/14/2008 with PD of Jan 21, 2004.
Case Interfiled on 08/06/2008 (Attached the EB2 I-140 to the existing I-485 Application).
Hoping that interfile is success.
I went to infopass yes'day, mainly to confirm my priority date. My employer used RIR labor and ported to PERM. Not sure of the PD, so took infopass.
She printed the screenshot and given me.
Find the screenshot attached. Preference E21 is EB2.
E31 is EB3
http://tinyurl.com/6rjs5p
Thanks.
Guys,
I took an info pass last week to check the status of my case. Specifically to check whether the interfile is success or not. IO at USCIS office mentioned that she cannot check whether my case is in EB2 or EB3. I am surprised to hear that. Gurus any has this kind of experience?
Also, She mentioned that my case is assigned to an Officer on August 13th. Do any one has any info how many days(on average), an Office will take to approve a case. Any info. is helpful to me and all.
Overall the Field Office people were polite.
Thanks,
Thun.
EB3 INDIA:
PD: Jan 21, 2004
I-140 approved: July 2005
I-485 ND: 09/04/2007
RD: 07/03/2007
EB2: (Same Employer)
PERM: Jan 21, 2007
I-140 Approved: 07/14/2008 with PD of Jan 21, 2004.
Case Interfiled on 08/06/2008 (Attached the EB2 I-140 to the existing I-485 Application).
Hoping that interfile is success.
more...
makeup including a tattooed ring on
sriteam
07-05 09:59 AM
http://www.startribune.com/484/story/1284995.html
girlfriend eyonce knowles nude gallery.
Harivinder
04-09 08:40 PM
My RFE's are
1. Emloyment verification letter
2. Proof of authenticity of Marriage.
1. Emloyment verification letter
2. Proof of authenticity of Marriage.
hairstyles tattoo.
suresh.emails
08-14 01:24 PM
Count me in to any IV campaigns.
I already have Green Card (GC) in hand. I would like to support IV for all good causes.
EB2-I Dec -2005 PD. GC APPROVED DATE : 08/06/2008
I already have Green Card (GC) in hand. I would like to support IV for all good causes.
EB2-I Dec -2005 PD. GC APPROVED DATE : 08/06/2008
kaisersose
04-03 11:42 AM
I was hoping that AILA would ask questions on capturing unused visa numbers and EB visa usage per year from USCIS!
I dont think USCIS can make a decision on capturing unused visa numbers. It is a directive that has to come down someone higher up, the president maybe. So AILA cannot ask them that question.
About annual wastage of visa numbers, since Ron Gotcher bought this news out, it must have already been discussed in an earlier [but recent] meeting or perhaps Ron has his own channel.
I dont think USCIS can make a decision on capturing unused visa numbers. It is a directive that has to come down someone higher up, the president maybe. So AILA cannot ask them that question.
About annual wastage of visa numbers, since Ron Gotcher bought this news out, it must have already been discussed in an earlier [but recent] meeting or perhaps Ron has his own channel.
isedkeem
01-31 07:01 PM
Based on what you believe that "BC has a much higher standard of living than Boston?". I hope that is not one of those silly annual surveys in which they interview low income and beggars on the streets and rate mainly based on health care and welfare for them.
Regarding raising kids, if you believe that doing that around prostitutes, lesbians and drugs is a good thing, so go ahead and live in BC.
Read the below for some truth about the Socialist Canada. I lived there and I know how it is.
www.notcanada.com
I have lived in both BC and Boston, moron.
Regarding raising kids, if you believe that doing that around prostitutes, lesbians and drugs is a good thing, so go ahead and live in BC.
Read the below for some truth about the Socialist Canada. I lived there and I know how it is.
www.notcanada.com
I have lived in both BC and Boston, moron.