priderock
07-12 02:44 PM
WHat happens when they return the visa number to DOS? Can they request them again later or these numbers are just wasted for this year?
Thanks!
Since the year is not over yet (until SEP30) , DOS can adjust the dates in next (interim ?) bulletin accordingly. That does not mean they become current like original Jul bulletin did , but at least some people will be able to file.
Thanks!
Since the year is not over yet (until SEP30) , DOS can adjust the dates in next (interim ?) bulletin accordingly. That does not mean they become current like original Jul bulletin did , but at least some people will be able to file.
wallpaper pictures selena gomez tumblr
saimrathi
07-11 09:36 PM
Thanks for bringing this up.. This is a legitimate concern.. Lets just hope this doesn't happen to any of us... Although hope is all we can do for now...:(
Has anyone considered the implications of identity theft, fraud etc if the USCIS does start returning the adjustment of status applications? When my daughter applied for adjustment of status a couple of years ago her application was rejected erroneously and returned to her. When she opened the package, it not only contained her information, but also someone else's highly confidential and personal documents. The documents were completely mixed in with hers - all out of order - and even the other person's check was returned to her. The person's case was also very time sensitive and of an extremely confidential nature.
We gathered up the information and personally returned it the local USCIS office - who told us it happens all the time! We sent a letter to the person concerned telling him what had happened and advising him to contact the office immediately.
Imagine what might happen if the USCIS starts returning the 1000's of July applications. There is a good possibility they could mix up applications, return them to wrong addresses or lose valuable paperwork. They certainly won't return applications via Fedex or UPS - they'll just throw them in the mail without any way to track them.
Many green card applicants, have social security numbers and have been working for years to build good a credit history. Anyone getting hold of these packages will have access to all personal history, addresses and of course the bank account information on the checks sent to pay the application fees. Just a thought . . .
Has anyone considered the implications of identity theft, fraud etc if the USCIS does start returning the adjustment of status applications? When my daughter applied for adjustment of status a couple of years ago her application was rejected erroneously and returned to her. When she opened the package, it not only contained her information, but also someone else's highly confidential and personal documents. The documents were completely mixed in with hers - all out of order - and even the other person's check was returned to her. The person's case was also very time sensitive and of an extremely confidential nature.
We gathered up the information and personally returned it the local USCIS office - who told us it happens all the time! We sent a letter to the person concerned telling him what had happened and advising him to contact the office immediately.
Imagine what might happen if the USCIS starts returning the 1000's of July applications. There is a good possibility they could mix up applications, return them to wrong addresses or lose valuable paperwork. They certainly won't return applications via Fedex or UPS - they'll just throw them in the mail without any way to track them.
Many green card applicants, have social security numbers and have been working for years to build good a credit history. Anyone getting hold of these packages will have access to all personal history, addresses and of course the bank account information on the checks sent to pay the application fees. Just a thought . . .
optimystic
04-01 06:44 PM
Before Nebraska service center retrogressed their processing dates I was able to speak with an IO. I asked her a few questions relevant to this.
There maybe a public USCIS rule / procedures that would confirm what she told me.
Q) When is the name check typically initiated
A> Soon after receipt
Q> Is my name check cleared.
A> wait a moment..... yes
I've also explained why Nebraska processing dates moved back...
1) Transfers from Texas
2) VB moving forward coupled with no pre-adjudication. Therefore they have to go back to older receipt dates.
3) 180 day name check rule taking effect -- clean up old cases.
4) Public processing date was internally known to be too far ahead of reality (and therefore causing service requests).
Now could USCIS hide behind name check now?
Probably not for more than 180 days, because you could file a WOM and win.
Can they stagnate processing dates --- yes, and there is a risk that they will around 2nd July 2007 date (last year's fiasco -- if I need remind anyone). That would make me barking mad since my receipt date is about 59 days before that.
A WOM will likely succeed when an individual is arbitrarily processed more slowly, and now name check is not an excuse. However, a WOM is much less likely to succeed when a whole group is processed slowly, since USCIS can always claim resource constraints. The happened with labor cert and BECs, the case(s) that I read the judge basically said to speed up one application would slow down another. So you need to show that you are behind the reasonable processing times with respect to others, then you can force USCIS's hand.
Looks like you may have gotten lucky with the IO that you encountered over the phone. I just tried reaching a level 2 officer. Unfortunately Nebraska center is closed at this time, so I got transferred to the national service center and possibly to a level 1 case handler. She seemed very polite and even sounded quite young ( intern !? ) . Here's transcript
She ran me thru several questions, default status update thats already on the online case status and finally I steered towards more specific questions
1) I wanted to check the status of my case, the online status has shown no updates since 7 or 8 months. Specifically was a namecheck initiated in my case?
A) Sorry sir, you have to make an Infopass appt for that, I have no access to that info.
2) Usually it should be initiated soon after receipt date, and completed within 180 days, right?
A) Yes sir, as per the new 180 day rule (seems to be aware of the new rule :) ), it should be done, but I can't tell you whether it has been initiated yet or not, or if it has been cleared. But if you doubt that it has been initiated and its been more than 180 days, then there's the new provision in law that your cards should be ordered immdtly, if everything else checks out (like PD etc). You have to make an InfoPass appt to get this info.
3) Can I place a Service request over the phone instead?
A) Your case is outside of our current processing date limits. You have to be atleast 30 days older than the current processing date at your case service center to initiate a service request.
4) When do you think the Processing dates will catch up with my receipt date?
A) The computer shows me that it will currently take 53 days (w.t.f !!) to get to your case !
I will probably give another try tomorrow during normal working times of NSC. Hopefully get to an IO who can tell the namecheck status.
But if its been cleared, then what next?? Just wait to see the PRD get stuck at July 2, 2007 eternally ???
I mean what cases are they processing ??? My PD is EB3 May 2001 !! Probably very near to front of queue. How many potential approvable *current* cases could there be that need to be processed before mine? How to get this information? Will an Infopass help to get such information?
If not then, whats the point of taking an InfoPass?
There maybe a public USCIS rule / procedures that would confirm what she told me.
Q) When is the name check typically initiated
A> Soon after receipt
Q> Is my name check cleared.
A> wait a moment..... yes
I've also explained why Nebraska processing dates moved back...
1) Transfers from Texas
2) VB moving forward coupled with no pre-adjudication. Therefore they have to go back to older receipt dates.
3) 180 day name check rule taking effect -- clean up old cases.
4) Public processing date was internally known to be too far ahead of reality (and therefore causing service requests).
Now could USCIS hide behind name check now?
Probably not for more than 180 days, because you could file a WOM and win.
Can they stagnate processing dates --- yes, and there is a risk that they will around 2nd July 2007 date (last year's fiasco -- if I need remind anyone). That would make me barking mad since my receipt date is about 59 days before that.
A WOM will likely succeed when an individual is arbitrarily processed more slowly, and now name check is not an excuse. However, a WOM is much less likely to succeed when a whole group is processed slowly, since USCIS can always claim resource constraints. The happened with labor cert and BECs, the case(s) that I read the judge basically said to speed up one application would slow down another. So you need to show that you are behind the reasonable processing times with respect to others, then you can force USCIS's hand.
Looks like you may have gotten lucky with the IO that you encountered over the phone. I just tried reaching a level 2 officer. Unfortunately Nebraska center is closed at this time, so I got transferred to the national service center and possibly to a level 1 case handler. She seemed very polite and even sounded quite young ( intern !? ) . Here's transcript
She ran me thru several questions, default status update thats already on the online case status and finally I steered towards more specific questions
1) I wanted to check the status of my case, the online status has shown no updates since 7 or 8 months. Specifically was a namecheck initiated in my case?
A) Sorry sir, you have to make an Infopass appt for that, I have no access to that info.
2) Usually it should be initiated soon after receipt date, and completed within 180 days, right?
A) Yes sir, as per the new 180 day rule (seems to be aware of the new rule :) ), it should be done, but I can't tell you whether it has been initiated yet or not, or if it has been cleared. But if you doubt that it has been initiated and its been more than 180 days, then there's the new provision in law that your cards should be ordered immdtly, if everything else checks out (like PD etc). You have to make an InfoPass appt to get this info.
3) Can I place a Service request over the phone instead?
A) Your case is outside of our current processing date limits. You have to be atleast 30 days older than the current processing date at your case service center to initiate a service request.
4) When do you think the Processing dates will catch up with my receipt date?
A) The computer shows me that it will currently take 53 days (w.t.f !!) to get to your case !
I will probably give another try tomorrow during normal working times of NSC. Hopefully get to an IO who can tell the namecheck status.
But if its been cleared, then what next?? Just wait to see the PRD get stuck at July 2, 2007 eternally ???
I mean what cases are they processing ??? My PD is EB3 May 2001 !! Probably very near to front of queue. How many potential approvable *current* cases could there be that need to be processed before mine? How to get this information? Will an Infopass help to get such information?
If not then, whats the point of taking an InfoPass?
2011 images tumblr gifs perfect middot; chris selena gomez tumblr gifs. selena
gconmymind
09-18 10:24 PM
Thanks to everyone who attended and represented us all!! Thanks IV core for organizing this. Please continue the efforts and we will all try to help in whatever way we can.
more...
JunRN
08-27 03:34 PM
by the way, can somebody answer these questions: If you got your EAD before the Receipts, does it mean your I-485 was touched and accepted? Is there any possibility that you got your EAD but your I-485 was not yet touched and accepted?
Is there anybody here who got EAD but for more than a month after that still got no Receipts?
Is there anybody here who got EAD but for more than a month after that still got no Receipts?
krishmunn
03-09 03:18 PM
These are just guidelines from a law firm. Most of the law firms were making money in porting cases for last two years, as number of new applicants were less due to economy. That does not mean that USCIS is going to approve these cases based on number of years of education. Porting within a company is a risky deal. Even though lawers dont make it sound like a big deal, for getting new clients. The old eb3 job that was used to file the first labor needs to be filled. If you are working with a desi bodyshop, be careful. You are inviting an audit.
This does not appear to be just guidelines from a Law Firm. Read the first line --- it says "According to the AILA-NSC Liaison minutes of 04/12/2007"
The questions regarding same/different company is not relevant to this thread.
This does not appear to be just guidelines from a Law Firm. Read the first line --- it says "According to the AILA-NSC Liaison minutes of 04/12/2007"
The questions regarding same/different company is not relevant to this thread.
more...
GCAmigo
01-24 12:51 PM
contributions have to be voluntary.. finger pointing would be of no good & on the contrary will be counter-productive..
2010 selena gomez tumblr gifs.
kirupa
04-03 04:44 PM
Scythe - that would mean that the three tied entries would get around $85 dollars (150+100 divided by 3), and that seems a bit unfair considering second place is $150 and third place is $100.
I'll get the poll up right now. It took me a little longer than expected because Temp poked me in the eye with his poke.
:P
I'll get the poll up right now. It took me a little longer than expected because Temp poked me in the eye with his poke.
:P
more...
snathan
03-31 11:39 AM
Action Alert: Please give your 1 minute to IV for media work
Please click the link below
ImmigrationVoice.org - Advocacy -- Issues and Legislation (http://immigrationvoice.capwiz.com/immigrationvoice/issues/?style=D&) Under the media section, please click on the first item: Highly Skilled Professionals Call on Congress to Pass Green Card Reforms
Enter your zipcode, select the local and national newspapers you want to send this message to and hit go.
Please help post this press release to media so that they become aware of our issues and can reach out to us for any coverage or information about this issue.
Done.
Please click the link below
ImmigrationVoice.org - Advocacy -- Issues and Legislation (http://immigrationvoice.capwiz.com/immigrationvoice/issues/?style=D&) Under the media section, please click on the first item: Highly Skilled Professionals Call on Congress to Pass Green Card Reforms
Enter your zipcode, select the local and national newspapers you want to send this message to and hit go.
Please help post this press release to media so that they become aware of our issues and can reach out to us for any coverage or information about this issue.
Done.
hair justin bieber and selena gomez
nagu
02-01 09:48 PM
We applied for H1B transfer on Jan/02/09 (California Service Center - Premimum) and attached pay stub and employement offer letter. First time we did not attach any contract details.
We got an RFE on Jan/09/09, Basically they wanted to know whether i am working on project currently. They are asking to submit contract agreements, client details (client letter - not sure it is must or not).
There are 2 layers between client and my employer and could not get client letter. However, I can provide the following docs,
1. Contract Agreement Between Employer and First Layer
2. Contract Agreement Between First and Primary Vendor
3. Letter from Primary Vendor (stating that i am working their client project).
4. Primary Vendor Invoices to Client
5. Time Sheet (Client approval)
6. Access Card
7. Work site Photo
8. Copy of Client WO (end date is 11/21/2008) - client with PO amount and end date is doest not matter... (i am not sure how is uscis will take it).
I could not able to client letter due to their policy. What do you guys think on this case approval. Any reply is highly appriciated..
thanks
We got an RFE on Jan/09/09, Basically they wanted to know whether i am working on project currently. They are asking to submit contract agreements, client details (client letter - not sure it is must or not).
There are 2 layers between client and my employer and could not get client letter. However, I can provide the following docs,
1. Contract Agreement Between Employer and First Layer
2. Contract Agreement Between First and Primary Vendor
3. Letter from Primary Vendor (stating that i am working their client project).
4. Primary Vendor Invoices to Client
5. Time Sheet (Client approval)
6. Access Card
7. Work site Photo
8. Copy of Client WO (end date is 11/21/2008) - client with PO amount and end date is doest not matter... (i am not sure how is uscis will take it).
I could not able to client letter due to their policy. What do you guys think on this case approval. Any reply is highly appriciated..
thanks
more...
diptam
06-10 07:29 PM
My point is not TSC or NSC - my point is we all sufferers should now unite and create pressure. I cant do alone , you cant do alone.
How do you want to contact AILA - why they should suddenly listen to a bunch of 10 stray immigrants like you , me ??
One thing i dont follow in your post how EB3 becoming U affect Processing times of I-140 ? I-140 doesn't depend on "Country of Origin" or "Retrogression".
Let me know !
There's a EB3 140 approval drought in not just NSC, but TSC too. I think it's going to get worse with EB3 becoming U. I am myself EB3 Mar 2005 and my job isn't looking very stable after my company resorted to outsourcing.
Can we suggest to AILA reinstatement of premium processing for those who've waited beyond some acceptable period of time? The same way they are doing for people whose H1's are at the brink of expiration.
I don't see any other way they will ever give heed to this problem i.e. where no monetary gains are involved.
How do you want to contact AILA - why they should suddenly listen to a bunch of 10 stray immigrants like you , me ??
One thing i dont follow in your post how EB3 becoming U affect Processing times of I-140 ? I-140 doesn't depend on "Country of Origin" or "Retrogression".
Let me know !
There's a EB3 140 approval drought in not just NSC, but TSC too. I think it's going to get worse with EB3 becoming U. I am myself EB3 Mar 2005 and my job isn't looking very stable after my company resorted to outsourcing.
Can we suggest to AILA reinstatement of premium processing for those who've waited beyond some acceptable period of time? The same way they are doing for people whose H1's are at the brink of expiration.
I don't see any other way they will ever give heed to this problem i.e. where no monetary gains are involved.
hot tattoo selena gomez tumblr
glus
01-24 07:46 PM
You can put any number in your signature.
We need an authentic interface to contributions by all members. This should require member login.
This is so pathetic you wrote. Why would one lie, and what benefit would you get by knowing that someone has contributer such and such? I am sorry, but I do not get your reasoning...
Also, that would require the IV members to develop a whole app or something like that to track the members' contributions.
I think people (at least some of them) are serious enough to write the truth; at least about their contributions......
And the fact that , "it would require member login", does not help here as anyone can register and become a member within 1 minute.....
Regards,
We need an authentic interface to contributions by all members. This should require member login.
This is so pathetic you wrote. Why would one lie, and what benefit would you get by knowing that someone has contributer such and such? I am sorry, but I do not get your reasoning...
Also, that would require the IV members to develop a whole app or something like that to track the members' contributions.
I think people (at least some of them) are serious enough to write the truth; at least about their contributions......
And the fact that , "it would require member login", does not help here as anyone can register and become a member within 1 minute.....
Regards,
more...
house girlfriend selena gomez tumblr
485Question
10-04 12:44 PM
I am from IL.
tattoo selena gomez tumblr gifs. selena gomez tumblr gifs. lol face tumblr gif. feb
niklshah
10-07 10:06 PM
Dude the person apparently not in good mental state. People do crazy things with they are in such situation. Who knows what went wrong. May be he felt that his family would suffer without him and incorrectly thought to take them with him. He seems to be caring father until this tragic event. Please stop pointing finger and pray that god be with the families who lost them.
I totally agree with u we dont know what situation that guy must be to take this decision..Here people gets panicked when they dont get their EAD card and Advance parole in time. So guys just pls pray that his soul gets peace...
I totally agree with u we dont know what situation that guy must be to take this decision..Here people gets panicked when they dont get their EAD card and Advance parole in time. So guys just pls pray that his soul gets peace...
more...
pictures selena gomez tumblr gifs.
franklin
02-22 04:17 PM
Thanks a lot. Pls. tell them about immigrationVoice and ask them to cover our issues.
Absolutely - in all responses I include my actual name/ email / sometimes my address or phone number if they request it. I always include a link to the IV homepage and disclose I am a member of the group - along with key issues our group faces (mainly a synopsis of the "green card process and problems" resource page here, and an example case study summary - i.e. "this is what is happening to me")
Absolutely - in all responses I include my actual name/ email / sometimes my address or phone number if they request it. I always include a link to the IV homepage and disclose I am a member of the group - along with key issues our group faces (mainly a synopsis of the "green card process and problems" resource page here, and an example case study summary - i.e. "this is what is happening to me")
dresses dresses selena gomez tumblr
nitkad
04-18 11:30 AM
It seems like you are one lucky guy if you are from India or China :)
If you are ROW then I guess you were born lucky. Just Kidding!! I love my country where I was born and grew.
If you are ROW then I guess you were born lucky. Just Kidding!! I love my country where I was born and grew.
more...
makeup fuck yeah selena gomez gifs
Yeldarb
04-18 12:21 AM
I believe Lou was referring to conversing on the internet. It definitely isn't a turn on to an employer if you are a 1337 h4><()r. You have to be able to get your words across. That is not to say that you can't use a bit of slang.
girlfriend Selena Gomez amp; the Scene
ak27
11-28 03:59 PM
We are with you.. CIR is lost cause. I would suggest that we should spend all our energy for interm relief and forget about grand bill.
hairstyles 2010 selena gomez tumblr gifs.
vijaysammeta
08-07 03:38 PM
Could someone live in the US on a H4 visa and work remotely for a canadian company, travel back and forth for business, all the while maintaining the H4 in the US? Of course the work in Canada would be based on a temporaray work status in Canada. What legal hassles would this create if any? Any comments. This may be a useful scenario for spouses stuck on H4 due to retrogression (no EAD, finished 6 years on H status). Anyone care to comment?
dilbert_cal
10-06 08:10 PM
From Matthew Oh Website:http://www.immigration-law.com/
Cases Pending Other Agency Action: 136,763
4,905: Other Agencies Investigation Result Waiting
130,091: Interview Completed but Waiting for Name Check Clearance
.
What about the 130k cases waiting for FBI name check - I'm surprised nobody is looking at it. If this is all EB related (worst case scenario), we are looking at around 240k cases of EB category. Well, I already had an email which screwed up my mood today and now this...... time to dump it all and first enjoy the weekend :-)
Afterall, GC is just one of the many factors in life and the more you keep it at the lower priority end, the more you can enjoy TODAY :-)
Cases Pending Other Agency Action: 136,763
4,905: Other Agencies Investigation Result Waiting
130,091: Interview Completed but Waiting for Name Check Clearance
.
What about the 130k cases waiting for FBI name check - I'm surprised nobody is looking at it. If this is all EB related (worst case scenario), we are looking at around 240k cases of EB category. Well, I already had an email which screwed up my mood today and now this...... time to dump it all and first enjoy the weekend :-)
Afterall, GC is just one of the many factors in life and the more you keep it at the lower priority end, the more you can enjoy TODAY :-)
gsc999
05-27 04:17 PM
House is currently controlled by the Republicans. If they do not pass the bill it would give the perception that the Bush admin. is ineffective. Bush's public rating have nose dived because of Iraq and now but if the bill doesn't pass it will show that he has no support in his own party. His core base is conservative Rep.
Also, it would be better for Republicans to pass the bill with some changes while they still control the house, once Dems gain House majority it may be too late for them to steer the passage of this bill with their amendments. This is a major issue, which I think will push them to pass this bill.
Bush will have to lean hard on some of the House Republicans to make this happen. He has publically commented on his intention of signing the bill by the end of the year.
These issues make me believe that House has to pass a bill. But again, politics is not logical.
Also, it would be better for Republicans to pass the bill with some changes while they still control the house, once Dems gain House majority it may be too late for them to steer the passage of this bill with their amendments. This is a major issue, which I think will push them to pass this bill.
Bush will have to lean hard on some of the House Republicans to make this happen. He has publically commented on his intention of signing the bill by the end of the year.
These issues make me believe that House has to pass a bill. But again, politics is not logical.